NL Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology
(ISSN: 3048-9679)
Effects of Termite mounds on Agro-Ecosystems in Semi-Arid Zones of Nigeria
Author(s) : Oluleye Anthony Kehinde, Joshua Olalekan Ogunwole, Adebayo Jonathan Adeyemo, Olubunmi Samuel Shittu, Uju Chinwe Osakwe, Kayode Samuel Ogunleye, Olarewanju J Omoju. DOI : 10.71168/NAB.02.02.112
Abstract
Termites activities related to the management of tropical and sub-tropical ecosystems, have been little studied. We evaluated, the effects of termite mounds, on soil fertility, as influenced, by different agro ecology, in Semi-Arid parts of Nigeria. Samples of soil were taken from termitaria and surroundings. The samples were analyzed for physical and chemical properties. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and means separated with Duncan Multiple Range Test at 0.05 probability level. Physical properties of termitaria had higher Clay + Silt contents, associated with good structure, increased water holding capacity with good drainage. Chemical properties showed increased organic matter, higher total nitrogen, available phosphorus, exchangeable calcium, magnesium and potassium, effective cation exchange capacity, than the adjacent or surrounding soils. The physical and chemical properties of termitaria are far better, significantly (p<0.05), across agro-ecology, with Guinea savanna having, highest improvement, in contrast to Sudan and Sahel Savanna. Improvement in physical and chemical properties of termitaria was attributed to the activities of termites. As the case may be, study revealed, termite mounds are enriched in mineral resources that can be used as organic amendments on sustainable basis. Farmers rather than removing completely termitaria, could be used in soil tillage, for crop production. Keywords: Soil Fertility, Soil Management, Soil Amendment, Agricultural Land Use, Organic Matter, Tropical and Sub-tropical ecosystems
Introduction
Over recent years, intensification of agriculture, coupled with high costs, and poor accessibility of inorganic fertilizers to resource-poor farmers, other inputs are oftentimes proposed, as alternatives [20]. Soil biodiversity’s [2], that is anthill soils [21], inhabited by termite insect, of the order isoptera [5], role is now being focused, as an alternative to chemical fertilizer [10,2].
Termites play integral role [3] in soil development, being one of the primary soil producers. Active anthills, in arid and semi-arid systems, are reportedly enriched with soil organic matter and inorganic nutrient elements, comprising Ca, K, Mg, Na and P, in comparison with surrounding soils [2]. Termite activities according to [9], affect nutrient and organic matter dynamics and structure of soil. Such changes had profound influence on the productivity of the ecosystem via carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and soil texture. Anthill soils are known to minimize nutrient losses and act as a form of manure [19], which helps to retain soil moisture and texture.
There is therefore need, to highlight hidden potentials, the critical role, which the anthills could play, in sustainable agriculture practices, as a locally available resource. Within the savanna and rainforest ecosystem, termites bring about an important change on the soil environment and occupy a large portion of the land [20].
In studies carried out by [10], on comparative analysis of anthill soil and surrounding soil properties in the University of Agriculture, Markudi, Nigeria, found out that differences in the chemical properties of the anthill and the surrounding soils, was as a result of ecosystem services, from termite, which included among others, bioturbation [21] and soil formation, nutrient transportation and cycling [24], litter decomposition [11], soil animal microbial diversity, amendment and remediation [18]. In the tropical and Sub-tropical Agroecosystems, the destructions and damages to crops and farm structures by termites have resulted in the reduction of crop productivity. The usual practice of anthill soil utilization by farmers, involves digging, heaping and spreading the soil on the field, in most cases, the anthill soils, are considered undesirable, and as such, removed completely from the field.
Therefore, the justification of this study was to enable us to understand the impact of activities of termites, on the ecology of tropical system, evaluating the hidden potentials for agricultural production. Samples of soils were collected, from the fields, across arid and semi-arid parts of Nigeria, from termitaria and surroundings, and evaluated, on comparative analysis of anthill soil and surrounding soil properties. Termite infested soils, nutrient dynamics enrichment, both physical and chemical components of the mounds, was discovered to be far better than the surrounding soils.
The study observed, the differences in the physical and chemical properties of the anthill in comparison with the surrounding soils, was as a result of ecosystem services, from termite. Judging from the findings of the study, it is suggested, in mitigating the effects of high costs, and poor accessibility of inorganic fertilizers, anthill soils utilization could be employed on sustainable basis, found as internal off-farm inputs, alternative, to chemical fertilizer, for resource poor farmers.
Materials and Methods
General features of the study area
Figure 1: (A) Study sites showing geographical locations. (B) Geo reference and altitude map of sample sites of benchmark termite mounds.
Study site geographical location
Figure 1 The study sites covered semi-arid and arid parts of Nigeria.
- Samaru town (11°09´52.0” N, 007°37´36.4”E, 692m above sea level), North–Central, in the Guinea savanna agro-ecology, 90 km north of Kaduna and 289km of capital Abuja. The Guinea savannah zone is the broadest environmental zone, covering about 50% of the country. It has unimodal precipitation of about 1051.7 mm per annual and an average temperature of 27.3oC.
- Hadejia town (12°32´37” N, 010°08´30.1”E, 350m above sea level), North– West in the Sudan savanna agro- ecology, Jigawa State, 617 km north-west of The Sudan Savannah zone is found in the Northwest stretching from the Sokoto plains in the extreme Northwest to the Central highland bordering Niger Republic and covers over one-quarter of Nigeria’s total area. Annual rainfall is about 60mm and the temperature ranges between 24oC and 27oC.
- Gamawa town (12°03´34.4” N, 010°33´36”E, 350m above sea level) Northeast in the Sahel savanna agro- ecology, Bauchi State, 650 km north-east of The Sahel savannah zone is heavily modified landscape of the forest/savanna transition zone. The vegetation has been decimated with overgrazing, the wood land has been subplanted with mixture of grasses and tress. Annual rainfall 1314mm, and average temperature was 265.5oC between August 28th, 2018, and September 24th, 2019.
A more detailed site description has been reported in Table 1.
Sampling Technique
Fieldwork was conducted between August 28th, 2018, and September 24th, 2019.
The stratified random sampling method was utilized as described by [7].
150 Samples of soil (0-15cm depth) replicated 3 times at 5 auger points from termite mounds and 2 m away adjacent undisturbed soils were collected in the benchmark villages covering Arable, Excavated, Grazing, Fallow Land and Forest Area.
The samples were then air-dried, at room temperature, crushed and passed through, a 2-mm aperture, sieved, to remove roots, macro fauna and stones. Quartering was done in order to avoid bias and also to ensure homogeneity.
Physico-chemical analysis of the soil samples
The < 2mm soil samples were bulked for each location and subjected to routine analysis as described by [12].
The soil pH was determined in (1:2 Soil/water suspension ratio) and measured using pH meter with glass electrode, The total organic carbon (C) determined by Wet dichromic acid oxidation method. Available P was analyzed using the bray 1 acid method. Total-nitrogen (N) was determined by a flame photometer, while and Calcium (Ca2+) and Magnesium (Mg2+) were determined by the atomic absorption spectrophotometer, after extracting with 1.0 M neutral ammonium acetate. The particle size analysis was determined by Hydrometer method.
Statistical analysis
All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Statistical Analysis System version [23]. Treatment means were separated using New Duncan Multiple Range Test at 0.05 probability level.
Results and Discussions
Benchmark termite mounds and site characteristics
The characteristics of benchmark termite mounds and other sites sampled (Table 1), for the diagnostic survey revealed that the land-use pattern is predominantly savanna with mosaic forest. The high timberland trees have been decimated, and the woodland that used to exist is presently implanted with a blend of grasses and scattered trees.
Agro-ecology | Location | Geo-reference and altitude | General characteristics |
Guinea Savannah | Kaduna (Samaru) | The Guinea savannah zone, is the broadest environmental zone, covering about 50% of the country. It has unimodal precipita- tion of about 1051.7 mm per annual and an average temperature of 27.3oC. | |
i. Arable
ii. Grazing land iii. Fallow Land iv. Forest Area |
11°09´52.0” N, 007°37´36.4”E, 692m asl
11°10´38.2” N, 007°37´35.8”E, 691m asl 11°10´38.2” N, 007°37´35.8”E, 691m asl 11°09´55.6” N, 007°37´19.8”E, 686m asl |
||
Sudan Savannah | Jigawa (Hadejia) | The Sudan Savannah zone is found in the Northwest stretching from the Sokoto plains in the esteem North West to the Central highland bordering Niger Republic and covers over one-quarter of Nigeria’s total area. Annual rainfall is about 60mm and temperature ranges between 24oC and 27oC | |
i. Arable
ii. Grazing land iii. Fallow Land iv. Forest Area |
12°32´37” N, 010°08´30.1”E, 350m asl
12°32´20.3” N, 010°08´18.3”E, 351m asl 12°34´29.3” N, 010°11´52.5”E, 354m asl 12°32´40.7” N, 010°08´56.9”E, 352m asl |
||
Sahel Savannah | Bauchi (Gamawa) | The Sahel savannah zone, is heavily modified landscape of the forest/savannah transition zone. The vegetation has been decimated with overgrazing, the wood land has been subplanted with mixture of grasses and tress. Annual rainfall 1314mm and average temperature 265.5oC | |
i. Arable
ii. Grazing land iii. Fallow Land |
12°03´34.4” N, 010°33´36”E, 350m asl
12°20´25.0” N, 010°26´44”E, 346m asl 12°03´39.5” N, 010°33´45.5”E , 366m asl |
*above sea level(asl)
Table 1: Location of benchmark termite mounds and other sites sampled for the diagnostic survey.
Effects of Agroecology on Termite Mounds Soil Physical Properties
Table 2 showed (p<0.05) significant difference in physical properties across agro-ecology with Guinea savanna having the highest Silt (126.23 g/kg), least Clay (66.40 g/kg) and Sand (807.37 g/kg) contents, classified as Loamy sand.
Soil Parameters | Guinea Savanna | Sahel Savanna | Sudan Savanna | Adjacent Soils | P- value |
pH | 6.1+0.45b | 6.9+0.9a | 6.5+0.74ab | 4.2+0.35b | <.0001 |
O.C. g kg-1 | 7.07+3.18c | 6.01+2.66c | 6.83+3.72c | 5.01+3.67c | <.0001 |
OM g kg-1 | 12.13+5.5c | 10.39+4.54c | 11.71+6.38c | 8.66+3.44c | <.0001 |
N g kg-1 | 3.14+1.21ab | 1.98+1.13b | 1.92+1.38b | 0.82+1.68b | 0.0013 |
Na c mol kg-1 | 0.52+0.25a | 0.31+0.15b | 0.31+0.17b | 0.21+0.16b | 0.0002 |
K c mol kg-1 | 0.04+0.08 | 0.06+0.05 | 0.04+0.17 | 0.02+0.04 | 0.4843ns |
Mg c mol kg-1 | 0.74+0.12a | 0.69+0.39a | 0.66+0.21a | 0.39+0.29a | 0.0034 |
Ca c mol kg-1 | 0.99+0.19 | 2.15+3.31 | 0.89+0.2 | 0.05+2.41 | 0.1238ns |
Exchangeable AI+H | 1.11+0.39c | 0.75+0.15d | 0.77+0.18d | 0.56+0.14d | <.0001 |
Al | 0.31+0.18c | 0.22+0.08c | 0.22+0.08c | 0.12+0.06c | <0001 |
H | 0.80+0.24c | 0.53+0.19d | 0.55+0.16d | 0.44+0.36d | <0001 |
Ecec | 3.44+0.67 | 3.97+3.59 | 2.72+0.38 | 1.23+0.68 | 0.3441ns |
BS(%) | 68.42+6.21a | 69.69+15.01a | 71.26+8.05a | 54.78+14.03a | <0001 |
Pmg kg-1 | 9.44+10.79bc | 7.01+3.65bc | 13.15+10.74b | 6.44+09.55b | 0.0002 |
Clay g kg-1 | 66.40+7.67c | 86.18+39.12bc | 72.09+18.05c | 62.33+18.13bc | 0.0005 |
Silt g kg-1 | 126.23+21.14d | 33.37+22.94d | 51.30+18.56b | 42.56+33.44d | <.0001 |
Sand g kg-1 | 807.37+26 | 880.45+60.15a | 876.61+38.61a | 895.11+40.16a | <.0001 |
Textural Class | Loamy Sand | Sand | Sand | Sand |
* Means values within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p<0.05
Ns =not significant, OC (Organic Carbon), 0.M (Organic matter), B.S (Base Saturation), Adjacent soils (Means)
Table 2: Effects of Agroecology on Termite mounds soil physico- chemical properties
In contrast to Sudan savanna with Clay (72.09 g/kg), Silt (51.30 g/kg) and Sand (876.61 g/kg) and Sahel savanna, sand (880.45 g/kg), Clay (86.18 g/kg) and Silt (33.37 g/kg), classified as Fine sand, compared with adjacent surrounding soils with average of 62.33 g/kg Clay, 42.56 g/kg Silt and 895.11 g/kg Sand.
Termites’ activity may have been responsible for the higher clay and silt contents in termitaria.
This further attests to the fact that termites’ activities in their colonies promote forces of attraction and adhesion among the soil particles of termitaria.
These findings are in agreement with earlier findings of [2], who found out in their study, that in the termite mound soil, 67.7% of clay aggregates had particle size greater than 2 µ compared with 48.1% in undisturbed soil and 19.2% of silt size particles were incorporated in aggregates in the mound soil while 5.6% were aggregates in undisturbed soil. [16] also reported that the termite mound had 94% fine materials (clay + Silt) compared to 52% clay and silt in adjacent soil in West Africa. [16] observed mounds had significantly higher clay content than the surface surrounding soils.
These results confirmed work by [4] in Ibadan South-West Nigeria, with recorded higher silt and clay contents in termite mounds than surrounding soils. Agro-ecological differences in change of moisture and temperature might also be responsible for this phenomenon observed. [1] reported soil transported by termites generally contains higher proportions of finer sized particles, and therefore typically demonstrates different clay mineral compositions than those predominating at the original surface stated. Chemical changes are brought about by the incorporation of organic matter while physical changes appear to be due to selection and sorting of certain particles resulting in a change of structure and particle size distribution [16]. The changes in texture brought about by redistribution of mounds and other structures in the surface is likely to be accompanied by changes in physical properties such as structural stability, bulk density, infiltration rate, permeability and water holding capacity [16].
Effects of Agroecology on Termite mounds’ soil chemical properties
As indicated in Table 2, (p<0.05) non-significant difference was observed in chemical properties across agro- ecological zones with Guinea savanna having highest OC (7.0OM (12.13 g/kg), N (3.14 g/kg), P (9.44 mg/kg), Mg (0.74 c mol /kg) and K (0.10 c mol /kg) than Sahel savanna OC (6.0 g/kg), SOM (10.93 g/kg), N (1.98 g/kg), P (7.01 mg/kg), Mg (0.69 c mol /kg) and K (0.06 c mol /kg) and Sudan savanna OC (6.83 g/kg) SOM (11.71 g/ kg), N (1.92 g/kg), P (13.15 mg/kg), Mg (0.89 c mol /kg) and K (0.10 c mol /kg), in the termitaria, compared to observed high and low values of OC (4.2 – 9.3 g/kg), SOM (7. 26 – 16.1 g/kg), N (0.01 – 5.2 g/kg), P (3.55 – 10.23 mg/kg), Ca (0.10 – 1.12 c mol /kg) and K (0.01 – 0.21c mol /kg) in the adjacent surrounding soils.
Soil pH ranged from, 6.1 to 6.9, in the termite mounds with, an average of 6.5, making the soils to be predominantly neutral compared to the surrounding soils with an average of 4.2. According to [3,4] termite’s activities generally increase pH. These findings are in agreement with [17] who reported mound soil of various termite species can have higher or lower values of pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, exchangeable calcium, magnesium and potassium, effective cation exchange capacity in relation to the surrounding soils.
It has been described by [17] that pedogenesis, organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling are highly influenced by termite. [6] in their investigation in Australia found out that exchangeable Ca, Mg, K were generally high in termite modified soils than unmodified samples.
[9] reported further that CACO3 were occasionally found usually in a band near the base of the mound and sometimes the quantity may be sufficient that the mound may be used as a fertilizer in the initial agricultural system. This agrees with studies by [8] that there was higher organic content, C/N ratio, Ca, Mg, K and P in termitaria of Macrotermes and Odontotermes species than the surrounding soil, furthermore [22], noticed an increase in organic matter in termitaria as compared with adjacent soils of Podili and Talupula [22] with 96.40+0.88 in India.
The mechanism behind the influence of termites on nest pH is not clear, but an increase in pH may result from an increase in basic cations, whereas a decrease in pH may result from an accumulation of organic matter.
Effects of Land Use on Termite Mounds Soil Physical Properties
Table 3 showed (p<0.05) non-significant difference in physical properties across land use systems, with Escavated Land having highest Silt (382.40 g/kg), and Clay (111.53 g/kg) contents with least Sand (506.07 g/kg), while the lowest Silt (163.90 g/kg) and highest Sand (743.98 g/kg) contents were recorded in the Graze Land, in the termite mounds, contrasting characteristically with lower Sand (607.20 g/kg), Silt (296.40 g/kg) and Clay (96.40 g/kg) on average in the surrounding soils. Higher clay and silt contents in termitaria, may be attributable to the termites’ activity, across Land Use, in contrast to the surrounding soils.
Soil Parame- ters | Arable Land | Excavated Land | Fallow Land | Forest Area | Graze Land | Adjacent soils | P-value |
pH | 6.3+1.13 | 6.5+0.22 | 6.5+0.84 | 6.9+0.92 | 6.4+0.69 | 5.3+0.63 | 0.2637ns |
O.C. g kg-1 | 6.65+4.17 | 6.53+0.6 | 11.36+12.18 | 12.63+11.76 | 9.76+10.11 | 9.42+0.67 | 0.312ns |
OM g kg-1 | 11.50+7.12 | 11.30+0.83 | 19.64+21.01 | 21.84+20.3 | 16.88+17.43 | 16.25+0.69 | 0.3139ns |
N g kg-1 | 2.25+1.02 | 1.53+0.88 | 2.42+1.72 | 2.22+1.75 | 2.47+1.16 | 1.23+0.42 | 0.6902ns |
Na c mol kg-1 | 0.27+0.19dc | 0.15+140d | 0.29+0.08bc | 0.47+0.18a | 0.43+0.21ab | 0.12+0.10 | <.0001 |
K c mol kg-1 | 0.08+0.06ab | 0.03+0.02b | 0.04+0.02b | 0.14+0.2a | 0.07+0.07ab | 0.01+0.01a | 0.0343 |
Mg c mol kg-1 | 0.67+0.39ab | 0.48+0.21b | 0.52+0.19b | 0.88+0.39a | 0.73+0.27ab | 0.21+0.31b | 0.0065 |
Ca c mol kg-1 | 2.18+3.26 | 0.44+0.16 | 0.71+0.31 | 2.25+3.06 | 0.86+0.32 | 0.14+0.23 | 0.0464 |
Exch AI+H | 1.02+0.47 | 0.82+0.22 | 0.97+0.56 | 0.91+0.29 | 0.95+0.43 | 0.62+0.70 | 0.8757ns |
Al | 0.29+0.1 | 0.26+0.08 | 0.28+0.22 | 0.27+0.11 | 0.27+0.15 | 0.20+0.02 | 0.9904ns |
H | 0.73+0.45 | 0.56+0.15 | 0.69+0.36 | 0.64+0.22 | 0.68+0.31 | 0.42+0.77 | 0.8208ns |
Ecec | 4.21+3.36ab | 1.93+0.59c | 2.51+0.64bc | 4.64+3.13a | 3.01+0.92ab | 1.08+0.96 | 0.0101 |
BS(%) | 64.43+24.91
ab |
56.15+4.35b | 62.28+13.74b | 75.36+9.17a | 67.99+10.
64ab |
66.4+0.98 | 0.0443 |
Pmg kg-1 | 6.21+4.62b | 10.3+4.19ab | 10.33+8.47ab | 8.91+ 9.2ab | 14.71+10.87a | 8.42+0.36 | 0.0337 |
Clay g kg-1 | 93.49+46.84a | 111.53+13.2
9a |
68.72+14.07b | 67.8098+14.3
1b |
92.12+33.
73ab |
96.40+0.88 | 0.0021 |
Silt g kg-1 | 248.91+265.
76ab |
382.4+355.6
5a |
197.27+230.84
ab |
236.32+234.38
ab |
163.9+188.
99b |
296.40+0.56 | 0.3679ns |
Sand g kg-1 |
657.60+68.23
ab |
506.07+9.92b |
734.01+40.1a |
695.87+96.95
ab |
743.98+100.
61b |
607.20+0.39 |
0.0548 |
Textural Class | Sandy Loam | Sandy Loam | Sandy Loam | Sandy Loam | Sandy Loam |
* Means values within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p<0.05
ns=not significant, 0.C (Organic Carbon), 0.M (Organic matter), B.S (Base Saturation), Adjacent soils (Means)
Table 3: Effects of Land Use on Termite Mounds Soil Physicochemical Properties
Effects of Land Use on Termite Mounds Soil Chemical Properties
Table 3. Changes in chemical properties across Land Use showed (p<0.05) non-significant differences in pH, OC, SOM, and Exchangeable cations, with Forest Area having the highest values in the termite mounds compared with the surrounding soils.
These findings, changes in N and P contents observed in termite mounds, in relation to the surrounding soils, agreed with the reports of [19,13]. There are interspecific differences in the accumulation of macronutrients in the nests as seen from measurements of several species in one locality as reported by [19]. On the other hand, [14] discovered nutrient accumulation in a particular species is affected by properties of the surrounding soil and the material used for building the mounds.
Termite mounds Interaction effects on Agroecology and Land Use soil chemical properties
The effects on Interactions (Table 4) of Guinea savanna and Graze Land indicated, highest Na (0.84 c mol kg-1), K (0.21 c mol kg-1), Al (0.52 c mol kg-1), and H (1.18 c mol kg-1) while the least Na (0.18 c mol kg-1) were recorded in Sahel savanna and fallow land, K (0.02 c mol kg-1), Al (0.07 c mol kg-1) in Guinea savanna and fallow land. With the highest Mg (1.15 c mol kg-1) in Sudan savannah and graze land, the least Mg (0.37 c smol kg-1), occurred in Sudan savanna and Fallow land. With the highest Ca (2.39 c mol kg-1) and least H (0.27 c mol kg-1) in Sahel savannah and arable land, the least Ca (0.79 c mol kg-1) were observed in Guinea savannah and forest area and Sudan savannah and fallow land.
Agro-ecology * Land-use | Na K Mg
c mol Kg-1 |
Ca |
Al |
H |
||
Guinea*Arable | 0.19±0.01 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.82±0.01 | 0.94±0.15 | 0.35±0.13 | 0.71±0.07 |
Guinea*Fallow | 0.38±0.01 | 0.02±0.00 | 0.85±0.04 | 1.21±0.04 | 0.07±0.03 | 0.64±0.07 |
Guinea*Forest | 0.57±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.79±0.18 | 0.28±0.00 | 0.65±0.11 |
Guinea*Graze | 0.84±0.01 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.72±0.00 | 1.01±0.04 | 0.52±0.02 | 1.18±0.04 |
Sahel*Arable | 0.21±0.00 | 0.05±0.00 | 1.03±0.01 | 2.39±0.08 | 0.37±0.04 | 0.27±0.03 |
Sahel*Fallow | 0.18±0.00 | 0.08±0.00 | 0.72±0.00 | 0.80±0.03 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.41±0.02 |
Sahel*Forest | 0.40±0.02 | 0.04±0.00 | 0.68±0.00 | 0.86±0.07 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.57±0.00 |
Sahel*Graze | 0.27±0.00 | 0.04±0.00 | 0.92±0.07 | 0.97±0.03 | 0.22±0.04 | 0.73±0.09 |
Sudan*Arable | 0.37±0.02 | 0.04±0.00 | 0.54±0.01 | 0.89±0.02 | 0.16±0.04 | 0.80±0.03 |
Sudan*Fallow | 0.20±0.01 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.37±0.02 | 0.79±0.01 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.56±0.09 |
Sudan*Forest | 0.33±0.01 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.64±0.00 | 0.96±0.09 | 0.20±0.06 | 0.63±0.02 |
Sudan*Graze | 0.21±0.00 | 0.06±0.00 | 1.15±0.02 | 1.18±0.02 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.57±0.08 |
Table 4: Termite mounds Interaction effects on Agroecology and Land Use soil chemical properties
The interaction effects showed (p>0.05) significant differences. This supports findings by [17,25] who reported
increase in exchangeable cations in Land Use Systems termite’s mounds.
Effects of termite mounds interactions in Table 5 on soil chemical properties indicated Sudan savannah and Forest area with pH (7.7), and Guinea savannah and Graze land (5.4), showed, neutral to acidic reaction. With Guinea savannah and fallow land highest in (O.C 10.6 g kg-1), (N 4.9 g kg-1) the least (O.C 2.1 g kg-1), and (N 3.5 g kg-1), in Sudan savannah and fallow land. With Guinea savannah and graze land highest (P 27.30 mg kg-1), content Sudan savannah and forest area had the least (P 2.80 mg kg-1). Highest % Base saturation (85.26%) was observed in Sahel savannah and arable land with the least (61.6%5) in Sudan savannah and fallow land. These significant differences observed agreed with findings by [2] who found out that conversion of natural forest to arable land generally leads to decrease in soil C stocks. According to [2] agriculture can reduce the soil C pool by a factor of two to three. This is particularly important in tropical regions, where SOM turnover is faster than in temperate regions [17]. In some cases, the decrease in SOM due to agricultural practices can threaten the sustainability of agricultural production. In particular, soil-inhabiting (especially soil-feeding) termites are thought to be important for the distribution, protection and stabilization of organic matter, the genesis of soil micro-aggregates and porosity, humification, the release of immobilized N and P, the improvement of drainage and aeration [17].
Agro-ecology* Land-use | pH | OC SOM N
g kg-1 |
P (mg kg-1) |
ECEC |
BS (%) |
||
Guinea*Arable | 6.22±0.01 | 2.6±0.00 | 4.5±0.00 | 2.4±0.02 | 0.90±6.40 | 3.12±0.15 | 65.71±2.64 |
Guinea*Fallow | 6.65±0.05 | 10.6±0.04 | 18.4±0.1 | 2.3±0.03 | 3.90±0.40 | 3.18±0.18 | 77.58±2.00 |
Guinea*Forest | 6.12±0.01 | 8.8±0.06 | 15.1±0.1 | 4.9±0.10 | 2.90±0.36 | 2.95±0.30 | 68.28±1.49 |
Guinea*Graze | 5.45±0.05 | 6.2±0.03 | 10.4±0.1 | 2.8±0.03 | 27.30±1.05 | 4.50±0.05 | 62.07±1.13 |
Sahel*Arable | 6.57±0.11 | 4.7±0.01 | 8.2±0.03 | 2.1±0.02 | 3.80±0.36 | 4.33±0.16 | 85.26±1.30 |
Sahel*Fallow | 7.68±0.06 | 8.3±0.07 | 14.3±0.1 | 2.9±0.01 | 11.76±0.61 | 2.43±0.03 | 73.65±0.39 |
Sahel*Forest | 7.00±0.05 | 5.1±0.03 | 8.8±0.05 | 1.6±0.01 | 11.20±1.40 | 2.71±0.10 | 73.94±0.51 |
Sahel*Graze | 6.33±0.12 | 5.9±0.03 | 10.2±0.1 | 1.4±0.04 | 4.13±0.30 | 3.16±0.23 | 70.06±2.18 |
Sudan*Arable | 6.92±0.01 | 2.8±0.00 | 4.9±0.02 | 1.7±0.04 | 3.86±0.20 | 2.81±0.02 | 66.24±2.14 |
Sudan*Fallow | 7.25±0.05 | 2.1±0.03 | 3.5±0.08 | 2.8±0.04 | 7.03±0.70 | 2.27±0.01 | 61.65±2.39 |
Sudan*Forest | 7.73±0.10 | 2.5±0.03 | 4.3±0.05 | 0.6±0.02 | 2.80±0.70 | 2.81±0.08 | 70.06±2.75 |
Sudan*Graze | 7.15±0.05 | 10.1±0.06 | 17.4±0.1 | 2.8±0.04 | 17.30±0.53 | 3.29±0.12 | 79.20±1.56 |
O.C- (Organic Carbon), SOM- (Soil Organic Matter), BS- (Base Saturation).
Table 5: Termite mounds Interaction effects on Agroecology and Land Use soil chemical properties
The effects on Interactions (Table 6) of Guinea savanna and Graze Land indicated, highest clay (103.2 g kg-1) in Sudan savannah and graze land, while the least (53.2 g kg-1) was in Sudan savannah and forest area. Silt (151.4 g kg-1) was highest in Guinea savannah and graze land while the Sahel savannah and forest area had the least (21.1 g kg-1). Sand content was highest (919.6 g kg-1) Sudan savannah and Fallow land with the least (775.3 g kg-1) in Guinea savannah and graze land.
Agro-ecological zones * Land-use systems | Clay Silt Sand
g kg-1 |
Textural class |
||
Guinea*Arable | 60.0±0.00 | 103.3±0.73 | 834.6±0.73 | Loamy fine sand |
Guinea*Fallow | 56.0±0.00 | 119.6±1.65 | 824.4±1.65 | Loamy fine sand |
Guinea*Forest | 73.2±0.00 | 130.5±0.57 | 796.2±0.57 | Loamy fine sand |
Guinea*Graze | 73.2±0.00 | 151.4±1.68 | 775.3±1.68 | Loamy fine sand |
Sahel*Arable | 83.7±0.57 | 26.9±0.57 | 889.3±0.57 | Loamy fine sand |
Sahel*Fallow | 67.6±0.00 | 21.1±0.28 | 911.2±0.2 | Fine sand |
Sahel*Forest | 67.6±0.00 | 21.1±0.28 | 911.2±0.2 | Fine sand |
Sahel*Graze | 77.6±0.00 | 22.8±0.00 | 899.6±0.00 | Fine sand |
Sudan*Arable | 63.2±0.00 | 50.5±1.52 | 886.2±1.52 | Fine sand |
Sudan*Fallow | 63.2±0.00 | 17.2±0.00 | 919.6±0.00 | Fine sand |
Sudan*Forest | 53.2±0.00 | 33.8±1.15 | 912.9±1.15 | Fine sand |
Sudan*Graze | 103.2±0.00 | 91.6±0.00 | 805.2±0.00 | Loamy fine sand |
Table 6: Termite mounds Interaction effects on Agroecology and Land Use soil physical properties
These significant differences produced two distinct classes ranging from Loamy Sand to Fine Sand. This is in accordance with findings by [8], that termites make channels in soil and influence soil aggregation by mixing organic matter with soil particles and thereby modify the physical properties of soil.
Conclusion
The anthill soils sampled, revealed, physical properties of termitaria had higher Clay + Silt contents associated with good structure and increased WHC with good drainage.
Chemical properties showed increased SOM, total N, available P, exchangeable Ca, Mg and K, effective CEC, improvement over the adjacent or surrounding soils.
Consequently, the results revealed enrichment, of anthill soils by termite activities over the surrounding soils. Therefore, the incorporation of termite mounds on farmland is to be highly considered if encountered on the
farmers’ fields.
References
1. Abe, S. S., and Wakatsuki, T. (2010). Possible influence of termites (Macrotermes bellicosus) on forms and composition of free sesquioxides in tropical soils, Pedobiologia 53 (2010) 301-306. https://doi:1016/j.pedobi.2010.02.002
2. Apure, S. A., Murongo, M., Hanyabui, E., Atiah, K., Byalebeka, J. (2020). Potential of termite mounds and its surrounding soils as soil amendments in smallholder farms in central Uganda. BMC Research Notes. (13) 397. https;//doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05236-6
3. Ayininuola, G.M. (2014a). Variability in geotechnical properties of termitaria, University of Ibadan, Nigeria case study. Pacfic Journal of Science and Technology .10(1): 567-572.
4. Ayininuola, G.M. (2014b). Termites Social Insect Impact on Soil Geotechnical Properties. 2014. IOSR. Journal of mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) Volume 11, Issue 3. Version VII.Pp: 18-20. www.iosrjournal.org
5. Belyaeva, N.V., Tiunov, A.V (2010). Termites (Isoptera) in forest ecosystems of CatTien National Park (Southern Vietnam). Biology Bulletin. 37: 374-381. https://doi:1134/S1062359010040072
6. Clement, R.A., Flores-Moreno, H., Cernesak C.A., Cheesman, A.W., Yatsko, A.R., Allison, S.D., Eggletton P., Zanne, A.E.(2021). Assessing the Australian Termite Diversity Anomaly: How Habitat and Rainfall Affect Termite. Ecological Evolution.23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.657444
7. Davies, A.B., Eggletton , P. Bernal J., Van Pensburg, Parr C.L. (2013). Assessing the Relative Efficiency of Termite Sampling Methods along a Rainfall Gradient in African Savannas. Vol (45) No. 4; Pp: 474-479. https://www-jstor.org/stable/23525378
8. Ekundayo, E. O. and Orhue, E.R. (2011). Physical and Chemical Properties of Termite Mound and Surrounding Soil as Influenced by Land Use in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Soil and Environmental Research.9: 53-58. https://www.scrip.org.
9. Ekakitie A. O. Osakwe A.A. (2014). Determination of Fe2O3, SiO2, K2O, CaO, Al2O3 and Mg in anthill soil samples within Abraka Town in Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “: 57-60..htttp://www.arcnjournals.org
10. Eneji, I.S. Sha’ Ato, R. Ejembi, S.E. (2015). Comparative analysis of termitaria and surrounding soil properties in the University of Agriculture, Markudi, Nigeria. Chemical Search Journal. 6:57-61. http://www.ajol.info>article
11. Fox-Dobbs K. Doak D.F. Brody, A.K. Palmer T.M. (2010). Termites create spatial structure and govern ecosysytem function by affecting N-2 fixation in an East African savanna. Ecology 91: 1296-1307.http://www.akbrody.com
12. Juo, A.S.R. (2019). Selected methods for Soil and Plant analysis Manual Series. No. 1, Ibadan, Nigeria. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97963
13. Kheyrodin, H. (2014). Important soil quality and soil agriculture indicators. Acadmiia Journal of Agricultural Research .2; 231-238. https://academiapublishing.org
14. Kotova, A.A. Golichenkov M.V. Umarov M.M. Putyatina T.S. Zenova G.M. Dobrovol’ skaya T.G. (2013). Microbiological activity in the Anthills of fallow lands (Ryazan Region). Pochvovedenie. 2: 31-34. https://www.researchgate.net
15. Reddy .K.S. and Raju, A. N., (2014). The physical and textural characteristics of termite mound from Podili and Talupula areas, Andhra Predesh, http://www.bestindia.com/ygsi/sin.
16. Shindi, H.A., Bandiga, H., Yahaya, M.,Aminu, A. (2019). Mound Distribution ans soil Transformation by Macrotermes bellicosus in Bagholo and Augie in Kebbi State. Asian Journal of Research in Zoology. Volume 2(issue 4):1-7. https:doi:10.9734/ajriz/2019/v214
17. Lavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P., Mora, P. and Rossi, J. P., (2014). Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services, Eur. J. Soil Biol. vol. 42 (Suppl. 1) S3eS15 ICSZ-Soil Animals and Ecosystems Services, Proceedings of the XIVth International Colloquium on Soil Biology.http://www.researchgate.net.
18. Lo N. Eggleton P. (2011). Termite phylogenetics and co-cladogenetics with symbionts. In D.E. Bignell, Y. Roisin, N. Lo (Eds). Biology of Termites:aA Modern Synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht. Pp:27-50.. https://link.springer.com
19. Mavehangama, S., Mapanda F. (2012). The nutrient status of organic soil amendments from selected wards of Chivi district in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research.7: 4362-4367. https://journals.plos.org
20. Miyagawa, S., Koyama, Y., Kokubo M., Matsushita, Y. Adachin, S. Sivilay, N. Kawkubo, S. Oba. (2011).. Indigenous Utilization of termite mounds and their sustainability in a rice Growing village of the central plain of Laos. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7; 24
21. Mujinya B.B., Van Ranst E., Verdoodt, A., Baert G., Ngongo, L.M. (2010). Termite bioturbation effects on electro-chemical properties of Ferrasols in the Upper Katanga (DR Congo). Geoderma 158: 233-241
22. Reddy, K. S. and Raju, A. N.(2014). The physical and textural characteristic of termite mounds from Podili and Talupula Areas. Andhra Pradesh, http://www.bestindia.com/ygsi/sinu.
23. SAS. 9.3. (2011). Statistical Analysis System. USA
24. Sileshi G.W., Arshad M.A., Konate, S., Nkunika , P.O.Y. (2010). Termite-induced heterogeneity in African savanna vegetation: mechanisms and patterns.. Journal of Vegetation Science. 21: 923-937. https://dspace.unza.zm>handle
25. Vanlauwe, B., Descheemaeker K., Giller, K.E., Huising, J., Merckx ,R., Nziguheba, G., Wendt, J., Zingore, S.(2015). Integrated soil fertility management in sub-saharan Africa: unravelling local adaptation. SOIL. 1: 491-508. http://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-491-2015
This article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.